A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 22, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on July 16, 2017.

On July 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00, at the “E restaurant” restaurant of the victim D’s “E” located in Orcheon-gu, Ocheon-si C; and (b) despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, the Defendant ordered the victim to perform the alcohol as if he would pay the drinking value normally; and (c) the Defendant received from the damaged person the delivery of 8 C C of the amount equivalent to KRW 32,00 at the market price, i.e., the 32,00

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Receipts (List 4), and replies requesting cooperation in investigation (List 28);

1. Photographs (list 3);

1. Each investigation report (List 16,20,20,21,23,26,29);

1. Previous convictions: Application of inquiries about criminal history (8) and personal confinement status (11) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Aggravation of Aggravation of Cumulative Offense is relatively minor (a confession and the amount of damage is relatively minor), unfavorable circumstances (including ten times of actual punishment) and criminal records of 40 times, and criminal records of the same kind of criminal records are under repeated criminal records of the same kind of criminal records, and criminal records are under repeated criminal records of the same kind of criminal records of the same criminal records of the same kind, as well as criminal records of the same criminal records of the same kind of criminal records of the same kind of criminal records of the same kind, and even though they were placed under investigation by the police after being investigated by the police on the same day after being investigated, the crime of this case was committed in the same kind of criminal records of the same day after being investigated by the police on the same day after being investigated by the police on the first day.

In addition, the defendant would not be able to seriously reflect the crime and make efforts to recover damage, but not only in the investigation agency but also in the investigation agency to further increase the false vindication that has been used for each past crime in this court.