logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.10.10 2013가합17118
지부장해임의결무효확인
Text

1. On October 14, 2013, the Defendant’s decision to dismiss the head of the Korea Youth Association B against the Plaintiff is null and void.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties was established by the Defendant on June 12, 2008 with the permission of the Minister of Patriots and Veterans Affairs for the purpose of enhancing friendship among Vietnam War veterans and the rights and interests of members among Vietnam War veterans, and on June 12, 2008, as the name of the “Korea War Veterans Association of the Republic of Korea of the Incorporated Association” was prior to the amendment by Act No. 11818, May 22, 2013, and was newly established on January 17, 2012.

4. 18. Implementation

(a) The same shall apply;

(2) Around October 2012, the Plaintiff was designated as an organization prescribed in Article 18-2, and changed its name as at the present time. Around October 2012, the Plaintiff was employed as the head of the Defendant’s branch. (b) The Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff. On October 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) held a board of directors meeting; (b) offered favorable confirmation documents to non-members who brought a lawsuit against the Defendant; (c) refused legitimate cooperation, such as obstructing the Defendant’s performance; (b) refusing to comply with a request for temporary convocation of the board of directors and a written petition to the members of the board of directors without any consultation with the Defendant’s central association; (d) offered a specific candidate’s request for election campaign; and (e) made a resolution to dismiss the Plaintiff from the head of the Defendant’s branch (hereinafter “instant resolution”); and (d) made a resolution to dismiss the Plaintiff from the board of directors on October 14, 2013.

(c) Of the Defendant’s articles of incorporation, the parts related to this case in the Defendant’s articles of incorporation are as shown in the attached Table. [Grounds for recognition] The facts that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence 1, 2, 8, Eul’s evidence 1 to 10 (each of the items, images, and arguments included in the number)

2. Determination of procedural defects

A. The plaintiff's assertion of this case.

arrow