logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1994. 8. 25. 선고 94마1252, 94마1253 판결
[채권압류및전부명령][공1994.10.1.(977),2508]
Main Issues

Emergency Financial and Economic Order Concerning Real Name Financial Transactions and Confidentiality and Attachment and Assignment Order for Deposit Claim;

Summary of Judgment

The reason why the account number of a financial institution was leaked in violation of the provisions of the Emergency Financial and Economic Order on Real Name Financial Transactions and Guarantee of Secrecy cannot be a reason to determine the effect of seizure and assignment order for such deposit claims, aside from the fact that the account number of the financial institution is subject to punishment under the same order.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 4 of the Emergency Financial and Economic Order for Real Name Financial Transactions and Confidentiality

Re-appellant

[Judgment of the court below]

The order of the court below

Seoul Central District Court Order 94Ra342,343 Dated June 13, 1994

Text

The reappeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of reappeal are examined.

The reason why the account number of a financial institution was leaked in violation of the provisions of the Emergency Financial and Economic Order on Real Name Financial Transactions and Guarantee of Secrecy is subject to punishment under the same order, the effect of seizure and assignment order for such deposit claims can not be determined.

In the same purport, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error in the misapprehension of law. The arguments are without merit.

Therefore, the reappeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee Jae-soo (Presiding Justice)

arrow