The defendant shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment against the defendant not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged [2013 Highest 245 [Judgment subject to Retrial: 98 Highest 2, May 22, 1998) A is a freight driver B, and the defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of automobile transport business, which is the owner of the above vehicle. A is a corporation established for the purpose of automobile transport business, and around February 18, 1998, around 04:26, at the front side of the Incheon Metropolitan City Office located at the Incheon Metropolitan City Office located at the point of 7.4 kilometers of the Seoul Metropolitan City Office of Highway, Incheon, and operated at the same place, more than 10 ton of the above vehicle, more than 12.1 ton of the above vehicle, and the defendant, who is an employee of the defendant, committed the above violation as to the defendant's business at the same place.

[2013 Highest 244] (C) a summary order subject to review: the Government Branch of the Seoul District Court on November 13, 1996, approximately 96 Highest 1759) a DKa Truck driver, who is the defendant, is the owner of the above vehicle, and the defendant has violated the restriction on operation by the owner of the vehicle in violation of the restriction on operation in order to prevent the structure, preservation and traffic danger of the road, the vehicle passing through the National Highway 46, Gangwon-do Special Metropolitan City Security Council in accordance with Article 54 of the Road Act and Article 28-3 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) to the part that "if an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 with respect to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be fined under the corresponding Article." The defendant received a summary order subject to retrial and issued the above summary order against the defendant.