(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.20 2017고단5841

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.12.20 2017고단5841

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2017, the Defendant reported 112 to the deceased in the “C” business place located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, by committing an assault against the deceased, and reported 112. Upon receiving the above report, the Defendant investigated the CCTV by the police box affiliated with the police box affiliated with the police box located in the Namnam-gu, South Korea, Police Station D, which called at the scene after receiving the above report, and confirmed the CCTV by the police box, etc. of the above E. The Defendant “I soon proceed, and I would like to have the police box.”

“The victim’s face was expressed as “,” and the victim’s face was boomed with both hands, and breathed, such as flaping bats, and flaping.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made in preparation of a letter of apology to E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the F Statements;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is reported by the defendant, and the police officers dispatched after receiving the report of the reason for the sentencing cannot be deemed to be a good quality of the crime by hindering the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers dispatched. However, the defendant does not have committed all the same crime, and there is no fact that the defendant committed all the same crime before, and there are circumstances that can be considered in the attitude of the defendant'

참조조문

-형법 제62조 제1항

-형법 제136조 제1항

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2017.06.07 2016고단3887

-수원지방법원 2017.05.24 2016고단8302

-수원지방법원 2017.06.07 2017고단371

-수원지방법원 2017.09.13 2017고단2907

-수원지방법원 2017.06.07 2017고단221