A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 31, 2017, at the defendant's house located in Osan City B, around 17:50 on March 31, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by assaulting the defendant by assaulting the slope E belonging to the D District Unit in the police station in the Jinsung-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si to stop and isolate the defendant's 112 reports

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement in preparation of each letter of apology to E and C;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - Circumstances unfavorable to the reason for the sentencing (a favorable consideration of the reason for sentencing) - The nature of the crime that interfered with the execution of justice by causing physical evidence to a police officer who is performing legitimate official duties is not good. The favorable circumstances - the defendant recognizes all the criminal facts - The defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime. - The defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime until now. The sentence is ordered in consideration of all the kinds of sentencing conditions revealed in the trial process.