logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1970. 5. 12. 선고 70다520 판결
[하천점유및공작물설치허가에의한권리의무이전][집18(2)민,048]
Main Issues

Cases where it is difficult to regard all or part of the company business as transfer.

Summary of Judgment

At the time when the defendant company agreed to allow the plaintiff to take the place of a river site of 104 square meters and the date of the right pursuant thereto as payment in lieu of the construction cost, even if the defendant company did not have any other property except the right of 1062 square meters including the above 104 square meters, the transfer of the above property is difficult to view the transfer of all or part of the so-called business under this Article, and thus the special resolution of the general meeting of shareholders is unnecessary.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 374 of the Commercial Act

Plaintiff-Appellant

Plaintiff

Defendant-Appellee

Long-Term Industry Corporation

Judgment of the lower court

Busan District Court Decision 68Na634 delivered on February 26, 1970

Text

The original judgment shall be reversed, and

The case shall be remanded to the Daegu High Court.

Reasons

We examine the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal.

According to the judgment of the court below, the court below rejected the plaintiff's claim on the ground that the defendant company did not have any other property except the above 1062 square meters including 104 square meters and 1,270,000 construction cost of the river site which the defendant company had the plaintiff start up the uniforms and 1,270,000 construction cost of the defendant company did not pay to the plaintiff by September 10, 65, the defendant company did not pay to the plaintiff the plaintiff the construction cost of the 1,270,00 construction cost of the 65.7.10, which was at the time when the defendant company followed the procedure prescribed in the River Act and agreed to transfer to the plaintiff by the plaintiff. The defendant company did not have any other property except the right to the 104 square meters of the above 104 square meters of the above 104 square meters of the above 104 square meters of the company's business. However, in the relationship under the court below's reasoning, it is difficult to view that the transfer of the above property cannot be justified.

Since then, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all members.

The judges of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) of the Red Marins (Presiding Judge) of the Republic of Korea

arrow
심급 사건
-부산지방법원 68가1005
-대구고등법원 1970.2.26.선고 68나634
참조조문
본문참조조문
기타문서