logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.20 2017고단1451
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 1, 2017, the Defendant driven a C Park Park Cor on March 1, 2017, driving a car at a speed that would not be known to the central teachers' distance protection area from the central teachers' street protection area to the two-dong market area of the 218 Incheon East-gu, Gwangju-gu, with the independence of Gwangju-gu.

Since there is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service neglected his/her duty of care to reduce speed and safely drive the left and right, and neglected his/her duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the signals, and neglected his/her failure to care to change the vehicle's driving signal to the stop signal, and caused a sudden failure to discover the E rocketing car driven by the victim D (50 years old) who was driven by the victim D (50 years old) who was driven from the back to the stop signal in accordance with the straight line in accordance with the straight line, the part of the right side part of the said rocketing car was the front part of the said rocketing car without being faced.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above victim D and the above victim F (47 tax) and victim G (60 years old), respectively, with two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant suffered from the victim H (59 years old) and I (46 years old), who were on the back of the instant passenger car, with the victim I (46 years old), who was on the front line, with the victim He (59 years old) who was on the front line and on the back line with the victim I (46 years old), for six weeks of medical treatment respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents under DNA preparation;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The defendant's reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that he paid a traffic accident by violating the signal.

arrow