logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.11.11 2020고정481
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 00:40 on June 13, 2020, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol at the inn police station located in Melela 2 at Selel on Selel 0:0 on Selel 13, the Defendant stated that “the taxi driver became a taxi driver and the rejection of boarding.” As such, the Defendant: (a) provided that “the refusal of boarding a railroad station would be a civil petition filed with the relevant public service center; and (b) provided that police officers, who end home, would be able to resolve the crime; (c) how to resolve the crime; (d) whether the crime would be resolved; (d) whether the instant case would be resolved; and (e) once I am, I am, I am again, I am, and I am thoroughly,” and (e) took the influence of alcohol at the relevant public office with three minutes of drinking and drinking behavior, such as having been done several times as they threaten drinking, and (e) having been done at the relevant public office with the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to file internal reports on the Diplomatic Statements (related to attaching video data);

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (Selection of Fines);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the instant case is for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, where the Defendant was punished in the process of finding a police station in order to file a civil petition against the refusal to take a taxi article, and the circumstance where the Defendant complaining for the suppression of his/her own name is recognized. However, under the influence of alcohol, the act of breaking a disturbance at a police station by taking a bath to a police officer, going on a ship, etc., while under the influence of alcohol, cannot avoid punishment corresponding to his/her responsibility, on the ground that the act of breaking a disturbance

In addition, considering the circumstances before and after the Defendant committed the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the age and character and conduct of the Defendant, etc., and the sentencing factors similar to all the sentencing factors indicated in the instant pleadings, the Defendant may be considered as a whole.

arrow