logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.03.19 2015고정51
공정증서원본불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Notarial deed, original, false entry and exercise;

A. Although the Defendant did not borrow KRW 260 million from D, the Defendant: (a) borrowed KRW 260 million from D on February 10, 2014 from D to D’s office of Masan-si E and 301 notary public F office of 301 on February 10, 2014; (b) filed a false report; and (c) had the notary FF enter false facts in the money loan contract notarial deed as the original copy of the notarial deed; (d) around that time, the Defendant had the said notary F office keep the notarial deed stating such false facts in the notarial deed; and (e) exercised it by having the said notary public F office keep the notarial deed stating such false facts in the notarial deed; and

B. Although the Defendant did not borrow KRW 180 million from G in the manner described in the preceding paragraph, on March 14, 2004, the Defendant borrowed KRW 180 million from G from the above G at the above place on March 14, 2004, and reported falsely to the effect that he borrowed KRW 180,000,000 from the above G on March 7, 2014, and had F a notary public F enter false facts in the Notarial Deed, an original copy of the Notarial Deed, and thereafter, exercised it by having the above notary public F office keep the Notarial Deed stating such false facts in the Notarial Deed.

C. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant borrowed KRW 160 million from H in the manner described in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) on March 17, 2004, a notary public of 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 from H had been borrowed from the said H on March 17, 2004 from the said H; and (b) on March 10, 2004, a notary public of 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won was false; and (c) around that time, the said notary public had the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication enter the defective facts in the notarial deed of monetary loan contract, which is the original authentic of the authentic deed, and

2. On June 13, 2013, the Defendant, having evaded compulsory execution, filed a lawsuit against consolation money and the claim for division of property by the former wife, etc., and KRW 10,000,000, and KRW 70,112,10.

arrow