beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of 8 months and 10,000,000 won, Defendant B with prison labor of 1 year, and Defendant C with prison labor of 6 months, respectively.
Reasons
Criminal facts
Defendant
A is a public official who is in charge of theO through City Viewing and Viewing N in Si Viewing, Defendant B is a person who works for the office of Q, a certified architect in P in Si Viewing and Defendant C is a director of the above Q.
1. On February 2014, Defendant B and R violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) said that the building owner, who is the building owner of the land area of 1,330 square meters in Sinung-si, Sinung-si, which was a restricted development area, had long been aware of as a result of the construction of an architect office, should
Then, the Defendant, around that time, agreed to the said R, that “S is a place where the building ledger cannot be permitted for neighborhood living facilities because there is no existing house since it was designated as a development restriction zone. It is not possible to grant permission. In order to obtain permission, a lot of money is needed to handle daily work. It is necessary to obtain permission from the landowner. It is to do so. It is to do so to the landowner.” The content of the arrangement of matters belonging to the public official’s duties of the U.S., and T agreed to the arrangement of matters belonging to the duties of the public official in charge of U.S. at the W cafeteria located in Siri-si, Siri-si, and the Defendant’s horses as above.”
On the other hand, R conspired with the Defendant to receive and deliver money and valuables 35 million won in the name of the public official in charge from T in the desire to receive a construction permit if the above building permit was granted, as if it were the construction cost for the construction work in S at Si interest.
R under such a public offering shall be from February 28, 2014 to the same year.
7. From March 3, 2014 to March 3, 2014, a total of KRW 35 million was remitted from T to T four times.
5. Until June, 16, the Defendant again remitted a total of KRW 35 million to a new bank account (Y) in the name of the Defendant.
Accordingly, the defendant is R.