logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.06.18 2014고단1208
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2013, the Defendant received 1.30,00 won from male customers in the B 4th floor in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic between D and male customers in the same way from around November 2013 to the end of the said time, including giving 60,000 won to male customers and sexual customers in shower facilities and room room where simple intrusions are attached.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D, E, or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act concerning probation or order to attend a lecture;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. provides that the defendant with reasons for sentencing two times a suspended sentence is disadvantageous to him.

However, there is a need to refrain from committing the crime of this case again while opposing the crime of this case. The above suspended sentence is the power that occurred before 10 years or more, as well as all the circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, economic situation, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence like the order shall be determined by considering the whole circumstances shown in the arguments of this case.

arrow