A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a plan for the settlement of disputes, which is a travel product sales agent.

around February 20, 2018, the Defendant promised that the Defendant will proceed to travel of the Malaysia for 104 members belonging to the victim at the “F” office operated by the victim E of the 5th floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C, and that the Defendant will proceed to the Defendant’s travel of the Malaysia for 104 members of the 5th day (from May 29, 2018 to June 2, 2018) of the Malaysia for the period of 4th day (from May 29, 2018 to the local expenses, such as air tickets, local travel expenses, accommodation, etc.) on the same day under the name of the travel expenses (all of the expenses, such as air tickets, local expenses, accommodation, etc.).

2.21. 21. 10 million won in that account, and for the same year.

3. 22. The same year: 20 million won at the account of community credit cooperatives under the name of the defendant, and the same year;

4. 29. Cash 20 million won, the same year;

5. 18. The above accounts of community credit cooperatives received KRW 52,820,000.

However, the facts are that the defendant paid approximately KRW 4 million to the above group travel goods sold in I (State) and the defendant paid about KRW 300 million to the above group travel goods, and the defendant applied for individual rehabilitation around May 2017 due to the debt amounting to KRW 300 million with respect to credit card companies and financial rights, and monthly income (200-2.5 million) was insufficient to cover living expenses and educational expenses for children, and used the credit card to the family and borrowed the above amount of KRW 80 million to the family. The above amount received for the travel expenses was paid only KRW 50 million to I (State) and the remaining KRW 70 million was thought to be used first for his debt and living expenses, and there was no intention or ability to proceed with the group travel requested by the victim without interruption.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by such false statements as above, got a total of KRW 120,0120,000 from the victim as the expenses for group travel and acquired property profits equivalent to the same amount by arbitrarily using KRW 69,82,00 among them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutions against the Defendant.