1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

On February 3, 2015, the first instance court's 5th judgment "the plaintiff and the defendant" shall be dismissed as "the plaintiff and the defendant on February 3, 2015."

On the 6th judgment of the first instance court, the "right to collateral security" in the 2th judgment is regarded as the "right to collateral security of this case".

The first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's "Before February 3, 2015."

From 7th to 9th to 7th to 7th to 9th to 7th to 7th to 7th to 7th to 7th to

“A. The Plaintiff’s assertion of this case is an accord and satisfaction agreement. The Defendant paid acquisition tax on the instant membership on June 30, 2015 pursuant to the foregoing accord and satisfaction agreement and registered as an administrative agency as a member. The instant membership (a total of KRW 1.533,60,000) was paid in kind for the instant obligation. Furthermore, the Plaintiff paid the Defendant the entire amount of the instant obligation through payment in kind, partial repayment, deposit for partial repayment, payment for withholding tax, etc., and the Defendant must cancel the registration of establishment of the instant neighboring establishment as collateral for the instant obligation. (b) In the event the obligor agreed to transfer the property owned by the obligee to the obligee in relation to the obligation, whether the agreement was concluded, or whether the agreement was to transfer the property owned by the obligor to the obligee in lieu of the payment in kind for the previous obligation, is a matter on the interpretation of the parties’ intent at the time of the agreement.

If there is no clear proof on this, the circumstances and circumstances leading to the agreement, the amount of debts at the time of transfer, and the value and transfer of the subject matter.