A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 28, 2012, the Defendant borrowed money under the pretext of “expenses for attracting non-funds” may bring the Defendant a fee of at least one billion won per month to the victim C at the “new branch of a bank, Cheongcheon-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, Cheongcheon-ro, Seoul.”

The high-ranking parties of the bank are to receive the funds from the banks in order to do so.

In order to extract the funds of the Suwon billion won, there must be friendly relations with the high-ranking persons of the prior bank, and the transaction performance should be at least a certain level, and it is a condition to attract the amount of the funds because of the high-level transaction performance of the persons who have been able to serve a large amount of loss in the past.

However, the balance that there is a balance of 10 billion won or more in the passbook should be proved in the case of the inducement of the funds.

It is thought that the payment of 10 billion won has been lent in a short term, and if the interest cost required is loaned 100 million won, it will be paid in KRW 300 million within two weeks by attracting the funds.

“A false statement” was made.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, the defendant thought it to be used for the business expenses of the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the injured party according to the agreement by attracting enormous income from the cash of the several billion won.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 50 million from the injured party on April 1, 2012, a check was issued on or around April 1, 2012, and received KRW 70 million around May 31, 2012.

2. On May 15, 2012, the Defendant borrowed a loan in the name of “deposit money for implementation project” from the victim C’s office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as described in paragraph 1, to the victim who believed the Defendant to talk about the amount of KRW 200 million by deceiving the Defendant, as stated in paragraph 1, and, if the Defendant borrowed a loan prior to the lending of the contract deposit amount of KRW 20 million due to the sudden shortage of the contract deposit amount to carry out the implementation project in the inland diving room.