logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.16 2015가단115936
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 9,061,912 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Plaintiff’s objection thereto from March 1, 2015 to June 16, 2017.

Reasons

1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed the facts constituting the basis;

1) A party-related Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant, Plaintiff et al.)

(2) On February 28, 2015, in the process of driving the front road B in front of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, on the water source basin from the Domino-distance bank, on February 28, 2015, the traffic accident (hereinafter referred to as the “accident in this case”) involving the Plaintiff’s Oral Seaba while driving the Suwon-si Dominton in front of the water source D.

) A person who suffered an injury to the right fall down due to the deprivation of the right, and is the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff; hereinafter the Defendant is only the Defendant).

(2) The occurrence of the instant accident is an insurer which has concluded an automobile insurance contract with E with respect to the vehicles of the E-learning, which shocked the Plaintiff. (2) The Plaintiff was at the aforementioned temporary location, and the Plaintiff was at the place where the U-turn was not allowed while the vehicle of the E-Operation, which was operated in the same direction as the vehicle of the Plaintiff, was in operation, while the vehicle of the E-Operation, was in operation in the same direction as the vehicle of the said mother-learning, and did not find the Plaintiff’s U.S., and the Plaintiff’s U.S. conflict with the right side part of the motor vehicle’s mother-learning vehicle. Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered the Plaintiff’s injury, such as the Plaintiff’s opening of the motor vehicle of the U.S. which was above the left part of the motor vehicle.

B. As above, the above E suffered the above injury to the Plaintiff due to negligence of neglecting the duty at the point where the U.S. is prohibited, and the Plaintiff is liable for damages due to the tort pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act.

As provided in Article 724 of the Commercial Act, the defendant is obligated to pay damages to the plaintiff who is the insured, within the limit of insurance money.

arrow