logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.09.12 2013고정1511
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who slaughters chickens and ducks and sells meat. The defendant shall slaughter livestock at a permitted place of work, and a seller of livestock products shall prepare the facilities in accordance with the provisions of the above, and report his business to the competent administrative agency.

Nevertheless, in April 208 to March 29, 2013, the Defendant, without permission to slaughter livestock or reporting on the sale of livestock products, was equipped with a facility to slaughter the chickens and ducks, including 24.2m2m2m2 in Gwangju Northern-gu, in a place of business with a size of 24.2m2m2m2 in Gwangju Northern-gu, and operated a business to earn profits from KRW 30,00 through KRW 50,000 per day by selling the chickens and ducks in the mooring place at the request of an unspecified large number of customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of two Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs;

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting an offense, Articles 45 (1) 1, 7 (1) ( points of slaughter at an unauthorized place of work), 45 (4) 9, 24 (1) ( points of sale of unreported livestock products) of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act, the selection of fines for each offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment of punishment under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act does not require the defendant to report, and in light of the fact that the defendant slaughtered the chickens and ducks, which are livestock, for a considerable period of time without obtaining permission, while running livestock products sales business, the nature of the crime is not less than that of the defendant. However, in light of the fact that the defendant separates and reflects his mistake, the defendant does not have any past record except four times a fine, and there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime. In addition, the punishment of the same amount as the order shall be imposed by taking into account all the factors such as the motive, means and result of the crime in this case, circumstances after

arrow