logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.30 2015고단1634
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 07:00 on April 4, 2015, the Defendant driven Ccoon-Ban car while under the influence of alcohol content 0.098% from approximately 500 meters to the roads in front of the Nakdong-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the same day, around 07:16 on the same day.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in C Dokdo-Bak Road Traffic Act, which is a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

On April 4, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of about 20km from the right side of the Honam University to the regular course of business in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju. On April 4, 2015, the Defendant continued to drive the said car at a speed of about 20km per hour from the right side of the Honam University to the regular course of business.

At the time, the Defendant, prior to the same direction, followed the E-P-type car driven by the victim D (n, 49 years old). As such, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance due to the following: (a) the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, was well aware of the situation; and (b) securing a safe distance to avoid a stop of the said motor vehicle; and (c) driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to stop the car in accordance with the stop signal, was found late to find it late and took a sudden action. However, the Defendant did not avoid the vehicle, but received the part behind the vehicle in front of the above Cam-Ban car, and received the part behind the vehicle in front of the above Cam-Ban car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the victim to suffer injury, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, the repair cost, such as the cost of exchange for the spread, did not take necessary measures, such as destroying and damaging the said motor vehicle to the extent that the repair cost, such as the cost of exchange for the spread, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. D. D.

arrow