logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.06.29 2016고정451
업무상횡령등
Text

1. Defendant A, B, D, E, and F shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 500,000 won.

2. The above Defendants did not pay a fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall use any subsidy granted to any social welfare business entity for any purpose other than its original purpose.

1. From 2011 to 2014, Defendant A was engaged in the application and disbursement of subsidies to the head of the JJ (hereinafter “instant center”).

A. On January 24, 201, the Defendant applied for subsidies to “K business” to create and provide hub production and sales jobs to self-support workers at the Jinju’s viewing around January 24, 201, and received subsidies of KRW 55,300,000 from the NAC’s account under the name of the Center around the 31st day of the same month.

On February 14, 2011, the Defendant purchased the case equivalent to KRW 42,00,00 at the market price as a daily gift for workers participating in the above business with the subsidies kept as above, from the M control point in Jinju L around February 14, 201.

From that time until December 29, 2014, the Defendant consumed a total of KRW 898,000 from among the money received as subsidies for K projects or N projects, such as the attached Table 1 in the list of crimes, for the purpose of purchasing daily gifts.

Accordingly, the defendant used the subsidy granted to social welfare business for the purpose other than its original purpose.

2. Defendant B was engaged in the application and disbursement of subsidies from 2011 to 2015 by Defendant B.

A. On January 2013, the Defendant: (a) applied for subsidies to “O business” to train self-support workers as nursing workers and let them work as free nursing workers for the low-income group in the Jinju area; and (b) received subsidies of KRW 40,425,00 from the Jinju Agricultural Bank account under the name of the Center around the 23th day of the same month and deposited KRW 40,425,00.

The defendant was suffering from the same damage.

2. In around 28.2, at the center office of this case, there is no national technical qualification certificate with subsidies kept as above.

arrow