logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.24 2015가단165117
손해배상
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 200,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from February 13, 2014 to June 24, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that runs a public performance planning and production distribution, music record planning, production, distribution, and affiliated entertainment business, and the Defendant is a corporation that runs a tour distribution and hotel business.

B. On December 2013, 2013, when the Plaintiff planned and is proceeding with the Defendant’s performance organized by the Defendant, the Plaintiff was requested from the Defendant’s team leader, CHD manager, D manager, etc. to “I want to operate a profit-making business by investing in the domestic performance performed by inviting foreign scambling entertainers among May 2014, so I want to operate a profit-making business by attracting a foreign scambling artist.”

다. 원고는 2014. 1. 15. E를 섭외하여 피고에게 자료를 제공하였으나, 피고가 다른 아티스트를 섭외하여 달라고 하여, 미국의 힙합 가수인 F( F, 이하 ‘F’라 한다)를 피고의 B 팀장에게 추천한 후 피고로부터 그 내한공연을 진행하여 달라는 요청을 받고 2014. 1. 27. 피고의 C 헤드매니저에게 ‘F 투자 제약서 요약본’을 보냈다. 라.

The Defendant requested the Plaintiff to send the budget execution details required for performing the performance in another foreign gathering. The Plaintiff obtained data related to the performance production cost from the I invested in the H performance in which the performance plan was formulated in G Seoul C C C C physical Stast, and sent the Defendant’s “H budget statement” to the Dracker on January 28, 2014.

E. While the Plaintiff consulted on the specific plan on the Defendant and F performance, the Plaintiff notified the F to the Defendant that “a performance is impossible in preparation for the publication of music records in the five-month period, so the performance schedule is adjusted to eight months,” and requested the Defendant to “a person who knows the Defendant, and the Defendant to the Plaintiff that “a public performance is impossible in the eight-month period at the time of the leave of absence, so it is impossible for the Defendant to hold the public performance in the eight-month period.”

F. The Plaintiff is a U.S. U.S. U.S. M&B guard (R&B) J, et al.

arrow