logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.09.17 2014나107282
자동차인도
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

The court of first instance partly accepted the plaintiff's claims such as unpaid rent, management fee, etc., among the plaintiff's claims on the principal lawsuit, and dismissed all the plaintiff's remaining claims on the principal lawsuit and the defendant's counterclaim claims.

Therefore, since only the defendant appealed against the losing part of the principal lawsuit, the part of the plaintiff's claim for automobile repair expenses, the part of the plaintiff's claim for the loss incurred due to the rejection of dispatch, and the part of the defendant's claim for counterclaim was excluded from the scope of the trial of the party.

Facts of recognition

The reasoning for this part of the Court's explanation is that the defendant is responsible for all expenses incurred in the management and operation of the vehicle, such as the failure, repair, and oil of the plaintiff's quantity transportation, taxes and public charges, and insurance premiums, after being entrusted with the vehicle, after being entrusted with the vehicle.

Additional "," and "842,298 won 21,230,113 won" of the fifth 10,11, and the fifth 12 x 910,563 won = 564,516 won (2,50,000 won x 7/31, and less than won ; hereinafter the same shall apply).

() 56,451 won (250,00 won x 7/31 x 7/31) rent 164,428 (728,183 x 7/31 x 7/31) management expenses 49,67 (220,000 x 7/31) management expenses x 7/31) additional tax 4,967 (22,00 x 7/31) management expenses x 903 (4,00 x 7/31 x 7/31) management expenses x 67,363 (298,324 x 7/31) management expenses / 2,258 (10,00 x 7/31) / 298 x 2225,280 x 2202, 216315 / 14) / 1631 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the facts found in the judgment on the claim for unpaid rent, management fee, etc. in the principal lawsuit, the contract of this case was terminated as of January 21, 2014 by the delivery of a copy of the Plaintiff’s claim for compensation and the application for change of cause as of January 17, 2014, and the unpaid rent that the Defendant has to pay to the Plaintiff; and

arrow