1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established pursuant to the Small and Medium Enterprise Cooperatives Act for the purpose of improving the economic status of its members and promoting the balanced development of the national economy by promoting the sound development of tools, tools, wholesale and retail business, promoting the promotion of welfare among its members and promoting their cooperative projects.

The Defendants invested in the Plaintiff on or before January 10, 200, respectively, in two old units (200,000) and one unit (100,000 won) in Defendant B, C, and E, respectively.

(A) evidence of heading 1, 2.b.

After the Plaintiff’s construction of the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F (hereinafter “instant commercial building”), the Plaintiff sold the said commercial building to Defendant B KRW 107/207,00, KRW 109,500,00, KRW 124/224, KRW 89,500,000, ② Defendant C sold the said 103/203 and 104/204 respectively to Defendant C, KRW 109,50,000, KRW 110/210, KRW 109,50,000, KRW 101/201, KRW 109,500, KRW 100,000, KRW 104,000, KRW 104,500, KRW 104,200, KRW 1220,90,000, respectively.

However, each of the above sales prices against the Defendants, the primary partner, was the amount discounted by 15,00,000 won from the basic sales price.

(A) Nos. 1, 2, c.

1) On July 21, 2001, the Plaintiff held a general meeting of partners and received 7,000,000 won per commercial building from its members as additional charges (Evidence 2). The Plaintiff decided to pay to its members who paid the said money the interest on loans or the amount equivalent to the interest thereon (Evidence 2). (2) On April 9, 2005, the Plaintiff held a general meeting of partners on April 13, 2005 and held a general meeting of partners to determine the settlement amount for the discount of the commercial building of this case as KRW 10,00,000 per commercial building, and the additional charges already paid by its members shall be substituted for the payment of the settlement amount.

(No. 2) d.

The plaintiff confirmed as a member through the resolution of the board of directors on July 2, 2010 and held the board of directors on July 2, 201.