Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On March 28, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury in the Young-gu Branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and on September 22, 2017, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence.
[2] On March 10, 2018, from around 19:35 to 19:45 on the same day, the Defendant expressed a bath to E (V, 43 years old), an employee, and F (n, 43 years old), on the ground that the value of the bread to be purchased is different from his/her own idea, and that the value of the bread to be purchased is different from that of his/her own idea.
It is more likely that this crym blocks can be crymed.
“......”, “C.........”
다 때려 부숴야 겠다.” 라는 등 큰 소리로 욕설을 하고, 피고 인의 일행이 이를 제지함에도 불구하고 이를 뿌리치고 진열대를 들어 올리려 하는 등 약 10분 간 소란을 피워 위 가게 안에 있던 손님들을 그곳에서 나가게 하였다.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the injured party's business.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each statement of E and F;
1. 112 Notification to a department related to the report of the case;
1. Report on internal investigation (related to the speech and behavior of the person under suspicion);
1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment to DNA CCTV images and caps photographs), 20 course photographs;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (verification of violent force), copy of the judgment, 12 copies of the judgment, and one copy of the acceptance status of each individual;
1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was that the Defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he/she was committed during the repeated crime, and that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, that the degree of damage caused by the instant crime is relatively minor, and that the Defendant agreed with the victim.