(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.10.17 2014고정827

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.10.17 2014고정827

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 30, 2013, from around 09:26 to 09:41, Defendant A dismissed from the office of the head of the management office due to the victim B at the entrance of the office of management of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office

As a result, the defendant jointly with the above F and G, caused the victim B to receive approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place, set up against the victim A’s act, was sprinking the victim’s breath, and sponsed the victim’s breath, and sphered the victim

As a result, the defendant got the victim A to receive approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Part of Defendant B’s legal statement (the fact that Defendant B’s legal statement was written in excess of A);

1. A’s legal statement;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Damage photographs;

1. CCTV CD (the Defendant B and his defense counsel argued to the effect that Defendant B’s act constitutes legitimate acts of self-defense or legitimate acts as a matter of course in order to defend the said act, by exercising force, such as reciting Defendant B’s act of entering the management office, etc.). Thus, in light of the motive, process, means and method of the instant crime committed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the relationship between the Defendant and the victim before and after the crime, and the degree of assault and assault, etc., it is not recognized that the Defendant’s act constitutes an act to defend against the current unfair infringement of the legal interests of himself or others, or a legitimate act that does not violate social rules.).

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.12 2013고정1098

-부산지방법원 2017.06.29 2017노1522

-수원지방법원 2018.07.06 2017노9457

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.05.21 2014고정327

-수원지방법원 2014.05.19 2013노3311