Cases of law by misunderstanding legal principles concerning the supplementation of blank notes;

Even if a person to whom a blank bill has been issued has been unjustly or unlawfully supplemented an addressee in violation of the initial agreement, the drawer may not set up against the addressee with an unjust or unlawful basis after the supplement.

Article 10 of the Bills of Exchange

Plaintiff

Defendant

Seoul High Court Decision 64Na1552 delivered on December 29, 1965

The original judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Seoul High Court.

The grounds of appeal by the plaintiff's attorney, the grounds of appeal by the plaintiff himself, and the third.

According to the judgment of the court below, since this bill was issued by both the defendant and the non-party 1 to the above non-party 2 on August 13, 1960, and the non-party 2 were issued with the non-party 1 to the non-party 2's original bill or the non-party 1 to the non-party 2's non-party 3,00 shares of the 13th unit store owned by the non-party 1, and the defendant was issued with the non-party 2's original bill or the non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 6's non-party 1's own bill.

Therefore, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the part of the plaintiff's lawsuit, other than the part of the lawsuit by the plaintiff, and the part of the lawsuit by the plaintiff, which is the first and second grounds for appeal by the plaintiff.

[Judgment of the Supreme Court (Presiding Judge) Na-man (Presiding Judge)