logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.10.19 2017고단1986
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor of four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 15, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 2147 (Defendant A)” (Defendant A), at the home of the victim E, who was placed in the living room by taking advantage of the gaps of the victim’s surveillance negligence, around 20:00, the victim’s market price was equivalent to 400,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

『2017 고단 2465』( 피고인 A) 피고인은 2017. 10. 11. 18:40 경 순천시 F에 있는 G 피시 방 안에서 학교 선배인 피해자 H(19 세) 이 예전에 맡겨 뒀던

For the reason that the balth does not return the balth, the victim was injured by the balthal balth, being towed and pushed down on the side of the elevator door on the elevator door, and the victim was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

[Defendant A] 2017 Highest 2500 [Defendant A, B]

1. Defendant A’s Special thief Defendant A, J A, and J were gathered to use the bronon from the backline to the backline, and the bronon was collected from the backline to use the bronon, and then to use the bronon to cover the bronon cost.

Defendant

A in collaboration with I and J, at the “L parking lot” located in K from August 15, 2017 to around 22:00, at the net city between 17:00 to 22:00, J takes his pro-Japanese victim M to the above place, and the Defendant A took the victim the victim’s “the victim’s Handphone loaned a photograph,” with the “the victim’s Handphone loaned a photograph,” with the victim’s 700,000 won at the market price of the victim’s possession, the victim’s Handphone was cut off to the victim, and the I took this back to I without the victim’s consent. From the “O’s Handphone sales store located in N at the net city without the victim’s consent, I excluded the possession of the victim’s Handphone by means of selling the victim’s handphone to B.

Accordingly, the defendant A stolen the victim's property together with I and J.

2. Defendant A and I, in relation to Defendant A’s special thief, took the Handphones by taking the Handphones from the backline, using the Handphones from the backline to cover the sale siren costs.

(a) September 2, 2017

arrow