(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.07.18 2013고정1283

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.07.18 2013고정1283

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, by a fine of KRW 700,00,000, and by a fine of KRW 3 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 3, 2013, at around 05:10 on February 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 1, television 1, card size 1, telephone terminal size 1, and beer 2, which were in his/her house, when drinking alcohol at the F entertainment tavern operated by the victim E in Gwangju Mine-gu; and (b) 1, television 1, phone size 1, and beer 2, which were in his/her house.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property equivalent to 892,400 won owned by the victim E.

2. Defendants A and B - Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) committed an act of destroying and damaging property at the same time and at the same place as mentioned above 1.3, and the victim E (the victim E, the age of 45) and the victim G (the age of 45) committed an act of damaging and damaging property. Defendant A expressed that the victim E would be “Chewing”, and the victim E would be scam back to the head by scaming the victim E, and Defendant B committed an act of assault by scaming the victim E’s chest, scambling the victim E into a wall, scambling the victim G.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted victims.

3. Defendant C - The Defendant, at the same time and place as above 1.12 reported and sent to the scene, refused to follow the contents of damage from the above E and G and arrest the Defendant in the act of committing a crime and arrest the Defendant on the patrol vehicle on several occasions, namely, “I and J” saw that “I and J interfered with the performance of official duties of the police officer,” and that I and J interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of official duties, such as: “I and the police officer: (a) have returned this dog to the police box; (b) have returned it to the police box; (c) have returned it to the police officer to the police box who continued to boom; and (d) have interfered with the police officer’s performance of official duties by breaking the floor of the patrol vehicle by taking a bath to the police officer.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each statement by the police officer against E, G, I, and J is written 1.

참조조문

-폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2015.05.12 2014고단5564

-대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.06.04 2015고단141

-서울남부지방법원 2014.06.26 2014고단1521

-서울남부지방법원 2013.12.11 2013고정2119

-서울북부지방법원 2017.11.30 2017고단3309