The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Since the Defendant, as to the date and time stated in the facts charged, did not administer narcotics, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the charges of this case.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court (one year and two months of imprisonment, additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The lower court’s determination on the assertion of fact: (a) comprehensively taking account of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated: (i) the one-time injection device discovered in the part of the dwelling space of the Defendant and E living together with the DNA of the Defendant was detected; (ii) the Defendant’s clock was found in the same form as the Defendant’s clock ordinarily appeared in both arms and horses; (iii) the Defendant’s two cellphones used in the past are turned off and avoided the investigation agency’s tracking; (iv) at the time of the Defendant’s visit in the detention house, E is difficult to continuously point out the phone medication of the Defendant’s clock; and (v) the Defendant is also informed of the fact that the Defendant’s clock was detected in the part of the Defendant’s clock that “the clock was detected in the future.”