The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the Defendants’ interference with their respective duties, the Defendants found his/her father and son to find out to the G Child Care Center in order to resist their children from their children in “G Child Care Center” (hereinafter “Child Care Center”) and there was somewhat high speech, the Defendants did not interfere with the class of the Child Care Center, the lower court’s judgment convicting the Defendants of this part of the charges, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, is erroneous.

B. Defendant B’s defamation: (a) there was a fact that Defendant B believed that Defendant B would have been a son’s birth from the son’s child care center; (b) sent Defendant B access to the “J” to the son’s horse, who is an infant attending the same child care center; (c) this is not for the public interest of preventing the occurrence of the son’s birth in the child care center, but for the sake of the victim F and H’s reputation; and (d) Defendant B provided Defendant B’s notice of the son’s son’s son’s son to the public of the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’

2. Determination on interference with business

가. 이 부분 공소사실의 요지 피고인들은 2011. 11. 4. 14:30경부터 같은 날 15:10경까지 창원시 마산합포구 D에 있는, 피고인들의 자녀인 E이 원생으로 있고 피해자 F가 운영하는 어린이집에서 피해자와 어린이집 교사인 H에게 피해자와 H가 E을 때리고 감금 등을 했다고 하면서 피고인 A는 "사실대로 얘기해, 빨리 얘기해, 어디 때렸어, 증거 없다고 니 그리 하제, 어이구 씨바 참 진짜 더러워 죽겠네"라는 등 고함을 지르고, 피고인 B은 "바닥에다가 똥 쌌다고 때리고 그랬대...