logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.01.19 2015고단5275
부정경쟁방지및영업비밀보호에관한법률위반(영업비밀국외누설등)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 order 5275] From May 1, 2013 to January 31, 2015, Defendant A works as a research group in charge of research, development, and operation, and who works as a member of the research group in charge of research and development (Milbase), which is the core material of the "Color Red Cross (Colbist)" distributed from the victim corporation I (hereinafter referred to as "victim") to LCD panel from May 1, 2013 to January 31, 2015.

1. Defendant A in occupational breach of trust shall return or discard important data, such as trade secrets, which he/she acquired, collected, or stored while working in a victimized company, to the victimized company at the time of withdrawal, and notwithstanding the fact that there was an occupational duty that should not be taken out without permission, Defendant A received materials, such as the material and mixing of “micks”, manufacturing technology, manufacturing process, etc., which are trade secrets of the victimized company, for his/her own interest, and for his/her future employment, etc.

Accordingly, on December 10, 2014, immediately after the transfer of the above L company was finalized, Defendant A carried out to the damaged company outside of the damaged company without permission, the name of the raw material of the "Seis", which is the business secrets of the victimized company using the NAE, and the file of the "Seis No. 12120 (120) .xlsx" to his NAN (N) NABBBB, and from that to December 2 of the same year, 617 files containing the business secrets of the victimized company, such as the list of crimes, in the same manner, including 617 files containing the business secrets of the victimized company, as described in the above NAN (N) NABBD by the same method.

As a result, Defendant A is in violation of the occupational duty to study the trade secrets of the victimized company.

arrow