logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.12.02 2020고단5601
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of six months and a fine of five hundred thousand won.

When the accused does not pay a fine, 10,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 22:50 on May 12, 2020, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) called “C” in the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Police Agency 112 reporting center under the influence of alcohol; (b) although the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the front of the “C” in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Police Agency 112 reporting center, the Defendant did not engage in a espionage, he reported the

As a result, the Defendant reported a false crime to a public official.

2. Around 22:53 on May 12, 2020, the Defendant attempted to prevent the use of each part of Esch Rexroth car, the victim D, who was parked in front of the property at the location of paragraph 1. At around 22:53, the Defendant attempted to reduce the left-hand side of the Esch Rexroth car and the part behind the left-hand side of the vehicle, on three occasions, but failed to achieve that purpose.

3. At around 23:00 on May 12, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 1. Around 23:00, the Defendant: (b) sought a protest from the victim D on the Defendant’s moving to a passenger car owned by the victim, such as 2. Around 2.0, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face one time with the victim’s right kne, walking on three occasions on the right edge; and (c) the victim’s face one time with the right drinking.

4. On May 12, 2020, at around 23:10 on May 12, 2020, the Defendant arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender due to the crime of assault, etc., and transferred the Defendant to the F District Unit of the Incheon Southern Police Station.

At around 23:25 on the same day, the Defendant d's cell phone device was used to assault G on the face of G, which heard the statement about damage from D within the F District.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police officers 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report on the defendant's legal statement 112 Report G and the police statement statement of D (the obstruction of the performance of suspect's duties, the video of assault evidence evidence)

1. Articles 136(1), 371, 366, and 260(1) of the Criminal Act and the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow