The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not contain any assault against the victims as stated in the facts charged of this case. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts charged of this case and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's duly adopted and investigated evidence, it is sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victims as stated in the facts charged in this case, and the judgment of the court below sharing this conclusion is just, and it cannot be said that there was an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts, and thus, it does not accept the defendant's assertion.

A. The victim D and G made a statement to the effect that “The defendant was faced with the victim D who want to leave the community hall on their breast and chests, and the part on the left side of the above victim’s clothes in favor of the victim D at the end of the entrance, which became favorable. Accordingly, the victim G prevented the defendant from taking a double arms between the defendant and the victim D, and then examined the victim D’s condition. At that time, the defendant made a statement to the effect that “the victim was in excess of the victim G by cutting down the lower part of the victim’s timber and walkinging down the front part of the solitary so that the victim G goes beyond the future,” and all of the above statements were consistent at the investigative agency up to the point of this court.

나. 위 L는 “피고인은 발로 피해자 G의 배 부위를 찼다”는 취지로 피해자 G가 폭행당한 신체 부위를 달리 진술하였고, “K가 피고인이 피해자들을 폭행하는 것을 모두 보았을 것이다”라는 피해자 G의 주장과는 달리 위 K는 "자신은 피해자 G가 마을회관 현관 바닥에 넘어져 있는 것은 보았으나, 피고인이 피해자 G를 발로...