beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 93,221,478 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 61,980,985 to Plaintiff B, as well as the aforementioned amount.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The recognition of facts: (a) around 04:10 on August 23, 2013, C driven a DNA franchise vehicle and driven the vehicle at a speed of about 101km at the speed of about 101km at the speed of speed exceeding the speed of 101km in front of the previous North Korean trading company located in Song-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul at the front of the vehicle registration office (70km in speed) and driven the vehicle at a speed of about 01km in front of the vehicle, and used the left part part of the E, which was used at the first lane in front of the vehicle, with the front right part of the vehicle, brought an injury to the left part of the motor vehicle, and then, on August 23, 2013, C driven the motor vehicle at a speed of about 04:12, 2013, while driving the vehicle at a speed of about 59:6 meters in front of the vehicle's death.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” Plaintiff A is the wife of the network E (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”), Plaintiff B is the deceased’s children, and Defendant Eastern Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant East Fire Marine Insurance”) is the insurer who concluded the automobile insurance contract with respect to vehicles driven by Defendant Eastern Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant East Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.”) and the Federation of the Korea Bus Transport Business Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Federation”) is the mutual aid provider who concluded a mutual aid
[Evidence] Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 18, 24, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 18, 24
B. According to the above facts of the occurrence of liability, the accident of this case occurred by the negligence that C, while driving a vehicle in the speed of the vehicle, neglected to drive the vehicle and caused the death of the deceased who was used on the road due to the shock of the front stream and failed to immediately stop the vehicle and to take measures, such as aiding and abetting the Deceased, and the negligence that C and F neglected to drive the vehicle while driving the vehicle on the road, resulting in the collision of the head of the deceased who was used on the road.