logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원군산지원 2014.12.04 2014가단50857
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 20,127,860, and each of the said amounts, respectively, for KRW 31,91,791, and KRW 391, Plaintiff B, C, and D.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The Plaintiff A dies from a traffic accident (hereinafter “the deceased”).

The spouse, Plaintiff B, C, and D are the deceased’s children, and the Defendant is the G vehicle driven by F, a traffic accident offender, (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

2) On December 2, 2013, the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle. 2) On December 19:35, 2013, the F driven the Defendant’s vehicle and driven the road in the H apartment complex in the military and mountain city, and did not discover the deceased who was seated on the left side due to the negligence that did not properly look at the left and left, and went beyond the body of the deceased as the Defendant’s vehicle.

당시 F은 덜컹하는 느낌이 들어 잠시 정차하여 차문을 열고 뒤를 보았으나 다시 피고 차량을 후진하여 진행하면서 피고차량의 좌측 뒷바퀴로 망인의 몸을 타고 넘었다

(3) On January 6, 2014, while the Deceased was under medical treatment at the Jeonbuk University Hospital, the Deceased died of a diversative organ due to diversous divessis, etc. on January 6, 2014 (hereinafter “instant accident”). F was convicted of a fine of KRW 5,00,000,00 as a crime of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in relation to the instant accident.

(Reasons for Recognition) Facts that there is no dispute concerning the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court 2014 Godan107. [Ground for Recognition], each entry or video of Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the accident of this case occurred by negligence, which led the deceased, who was seated on the road in the parking lot due to negligence in front of the city while driving the defendant vehicle, while neglecting the parking lot in the apartment where pedestrians walk, and caused the shock of the deceased, without confirming the occurrence of the accident caused by the vehicle.

arrow