The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2016, at around 00:45, the Defendant destroyed the property of the victim by blocking the “D” operated by the victim C (41 tax) by blocking the vehicle without any justifiable reason on the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and by continuously walking the right-hand part of the vehicle, thereby impairing the victim’s utility so that the repair cost can be lost by continuously walking the right-hand part of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Application of the witness C’s statutory statement law

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) appears to have been partially damaged by the Defendant’s act as the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment; however, since the vehicle of this case had been already damaged even before it, the details of the accurate repair cost on the parts damaged in this case cannot be confirmed and the degree of the damage seems to have been relatively minor, and other circumstances leading to the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, and the instant crime are considered)