1. The revocation of the driver's license granted to the Plaintiff on June 16, 2014 by the Defendant is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. On June 16, 2014, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition that the Plaintiff revoked the Plaintiff’s driver’s license as of June 20, 2014 on the ground that the Plaintiff driven a car under the influence of alcohol on April 23, 2014, around 0.104%.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, and the purport of whole pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Until 18:30 on the day of the pertinent drunk driving, the Plaintiff was driving 160 cc a beer and 160 cc at home after drinking, but after driving, he again 1400 cc after drinking 19:15 to 19:41, breathe alcohol concentration was measured at 0.169% of the blood alcohol concentration at home. The Defendant calculated the blood alcohol concentration at home as 0.0643% of the blood alcohol concentration at home with the above 0.169% after calculating the blood alcohol concentration at 0.10 % of the above 0.169% of the above 0.10% of the blood alcohol concentration at the time of the pertinent drunk driving. However, considering the time distance between the drinking time before driving and the drinking time after driving, the Plaintiff’s disposition of this case cannot be readily concluded as unlawful since it is difficult to apply the above 20.2% alcohol concentration at the time of operation of the above 20.

B. In this case, the Plaintiff from around 17:00 on April 23, 2014 to 18.