1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs and the Defendant are both the two-wing business operators who engage in the two-wing business at Dririwon at the time of their stay.

나. 원고들은 2017. 5. 2.경 피고를 경찰에 신고하였는데 그 내용은 피고가 도봉(盜蜂, 벌이 다른 사람의 양봉장 꿀을 훔치는 것)을 방지하기 위해 설탕물에 농약을 뿌렸고, 원고들 소유 벌들이 그 농약을 먹고 벌통으로 돌아와 원고 A의 벌통 약 230개, 원고 B의 벌통 약 145개의 벌들이 폐사하였다는 것이었다.

C. The Defendant, upon being examined by the police as the above case, acknowledged the fact that three sti pumps and one plastic field (hereinafter “the instant pesticide”) were contained in the ssti pumps and contained in the stowing field (hereinafter “the instant top and the field”) once in order to kill the punishment, etc. for Doing from May 1, 2017 to the following day, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiffs’ punishment cannot be collectively abolished due to his own act.

As a result of the appraisal by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation of the dead punishment, it was found that the putropy, which is the ingredients of the pesticide of this case, was detected to the dead punishment that has been discarded in the double-speaks of the plaintiffs.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry or video of Gap evidence 1 through 19 (including, if any, a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The party's assertion and judgment

가. 당사자의 주장 1) 원고들의 주장 원고들의 벌들 중 화분과 화밀을 채취하는 일벌인 일명 외역봉(外役蜂)들이 피고의 양봉장에서 이 사건 농약이 든 설탕물을 먹거나 채취하여 돌아와, 다른 벌들과 농약이 든 설탕물을 나누어 먹거나 날개에 묻은 농약을 옮겨 원고들의 벌들이 집단 폐사하게 되었다. 따라서 피고는 원고들에게 자신의 행위로 원고들이 입은 청구취지 기재 손해를 배상할 의무가 있다. 2) 피고의 주장 피고는 2017. 5. 1. 18:00경...