Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2012, the Defendant lent KRW 100 million to the victim D, who operates a wedding hall in the name of the Busan Shipping Daegu B, and requested the victim to repay the borrowed money on or around March 2013. However, the Defendant had been willing to recover the saidwale by failing to comply with it and urge the victim to repay the borrowed money in a manner interfering with its business, and to pressure the repayment by carrying out a demonstration by carrying out a ticket before the wawale.

1. Interference with business;

A. On March 26, 2013, between 15:30 on March 26, 2013 and 18:00, the Defendant returned to the said Cwa Holdings’s reservation office and the 7th and the 8th floor Sweing service, and thereby obstructing the Cweing’s marriage reservation service by force by force by means of: (a) having been going to receive money; (b) having been going to the representative; and (c) having been seated without going to the office; and (d) having continued to pay money;

B. From March 27, 2013 to 18:00 on March 27, 2013, to the end of 18:00, in the same manner as the above paragraph (a), the parties interfere with the marital reservation of the crowdfunding by force in the same manner as the above paragraph (a);

C. From March 28, 2013 to 18:40 on March 28, 2013, to the same place as that of the above paragraph (a), it interferes with the marriage reservation of the crowdfunding by force in the same manner as that of the above paragraph (a);

D. From March 31, 2013 to 19:00 on March 31, 2013, in the same manner as the above paragraph (a), it interferes with the marriage arrangement of crowdfunding by force between 15:30 on March 31, 201 and 19:0;

E. On April 17, 2013, from around 10:39 to 17:30 on April 17, 2013, at the same place as the foregoing paragraph of the foregoing paragraph, “B. The same year was obstructed by force, by means of force, from the point of view that “B,” the opening of the same year should be described as the opening, the year that caused the conclusion of the judgment, and the year that the year was in the same way, and the period was in the same way.”

2. Defamation;

A. On May 1, 2013, from around 16:00 to 19:30, the Defendant stated that “Cwa D’s representative shall have to pay back the money so that it can have to pay back the money.”