1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. From December 3, 2014 to December 3, 2016, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 1,3350,000,000 to the net B, as stated in the table Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 14, 17, 19, and 22, plus KRW 1,335,00,000,000,000,000. On February 2018, the Plaintiff sold to the net B the “raw-water pumps and girs for feed discharge” to the Plaintiff. As such, the Defendants, the heir of the network B, asserted that the Plaintiff caused the claim as above in this court, but did not expand the purport of the claim.

shall be payable in accordance with each inheritance share.

B. According to the evidence Nos. 1 and 3, it is recognized that the Plaintiff traded money in accordance with the attached Table Nos. 1 and 3 between the post office account (Account Number: I) in the name of his wife and Defendant C, who is his wife.

However, the above facts and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone are insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff lent KRW 13.35 million to the deceased B, or sold the pumps and pumps for the discharge of feed to KRW 1 million, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance, which differs from this conclusion, is unfair, and thus the plaintiff's claim is revoked and dismissed.