1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The facts under the premise of facts do not conflict between the parties.

Around September 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant manufactured and installed two set pumps to the Defendant. The Defendant entered into a contract under which the Plaintiff shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 88,000,000 in return (hereinafter “instant contract”). The Defendant paid the down payment of KRW 17,60,000 to the Plaintiff.

B. On February 2016, the Plaintiff installed two pumps in the Defendant’s business office (hereinafter “each of the instant dryers”).

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion completed the Plaintiff’s performance of duties stipulated in the instant contract, such as the manufacture and installation of two pumps, etc., and additionally installed a pande controler, and accepted a pande and a compresser. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the remainder and the amount of KRW 86,40,000,000, in total, of the balance and repair costs of the pande controler.

B. According to the fact-finding results on the evidence Nos. 12 through 15, 20, 41-1 of Eul, and Eul evidence Nos. 41-1 of this case, each dry machine of this case cannot be processed with the string string string string string 21 hours, such as inserting living in each dry machine of this case and building 21 hours only average 4.4% even if the construction was done, it can be recognized that each of the dry machines of this case cannot be processed with the string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string string 2017.