logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.01.20 2016노759
강제추행
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In other words, misunderstanding of the facts and legal principles, the Defendant’s misunderstanding of the body of the victim as stated in the facts charged is merely an intentional act while locked with the victim, not an intentional indecent act.

In addition, it is clear that the defendant did not assault or threaten the victim's resistance to the victim's body to the extent that he did not suppress the victim's resistance, and this does not constitute a so-called "indecent act committed by the victim's body as an indecent act."

In this respect, the defendant can not be punished as an indecent act.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (the imprisonment of six months suspended, the community service order of 80 hours, and the order to attend a sexual assault treatment program of 20 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination on the misapprehension of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant was aware of the victim C (V, 21 years of age) and a middle school student.

At around 03:00 on September 13, 2015, the Defendant, at the victim’s house located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu, committed an indecent act against the victim by forcing the locked victim to commit an indecent act. On the same day, around 09:30 on the same day, the Defendant kept the son into the victim’s sitts, kids, kids, kids, and kids, kids, and kids of the victim by her hand when the victim kids the victim from diving, and her kids and kids were kids of the victim by her hand. The Defendant committed an indecent act by coercioning the victim’s sat and her breast part by force.

B. The lower court denied the Defendant’s criminal act similar to the grounds for appeal, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated.

(c)

On the other hand, according to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as above, the defendant is guilty.

arrow