logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2017.05.23 2015가단4589
건물철거 및 토지인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. References to the attached Form 16, 17, 18, 15, 33, 34, among the land size of 660 square meters prior to C, and 93 square meters prior to D, Jeonju-si.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On December 29, 2014, the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of 660 square meters and 993 square meters and 393 square meters and 660 square meters and 993 square meters and 30 square meters and 200 square meters and 200 square meters and 300 square meters and 300 square meters and 200 square meters and 300 square meters, respectively.

[Reasons for Recognition] The plaintiff's assertion in Gap's non-contentious facts and Gap's assertion in Gap's evidence 1 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

A. While the Defendant occupied and used each of the instant lands owned by the Plaintiff, the Defendant owned and used the wooden string string roof, plastic houses, plastic houses, warehouses, waste agricultural products drying machines, waste boilers, red stoves, and plastic boxes for transporting agricultural products on each of the instant lands.

Therefore, the Defendant, as the owner of each of the instant lands, has the duty to remove and deliver each of the instant land to the Plaintiff, each of the instant land, the instant wooden streke roof single-storys, vinyls, warehouses, waste agricultural products drying machines, waste boilers, waste boilers, red bricks, and plastic stuffs for transporting agricultural products.

B. The Defendant gains profit equivalent to the rent from the possession and use of each of the instant land as above, and thereby causes damages equivalent to the same amount to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent from December 30, 2014 to the completion date of delivery of each of the instant land, from the date the Plaintiff acquired ownership of each of the instant land to the Plaintiff.

Judgment

철거 및 인도 청구 청구원인에 관하여 가 원고가 이 사건 각 토지의 소유자임은 앞서 본 바와 같고, 한국국토정보공사의 감정결과 및 변론 전체의 취지에 의하면, 피고가 이 사건 각 토지를 점유하면서 이 사건 각 토지 중 별지 참고도 표시 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 9, 31, 32, 10의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈁ 및 ㈇ 부분 133㎡ 지상 목조 스레트지붕 단층주택, 별지 참고도 표시 16, 17, 18, 15, 33, 34, 16의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈂ 및 ㈅ 부분 105㎡ 지상 비닐하우스, D 토지 중 별지...

arrow