1. At the request of an exchange change in the trial, among the Plaintiff, the amount of 951 square meters in Gangnam-si L, Gangnam-si:

A. Defendant B.

1. The following facts for the determination of the cause of the claim may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the arguments as a result of Gap's survey and evaluation of the rent for the first and second instances, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3-1 to 4, and the first instance court's appraiser N,O's survey and evaluation of the rent for the first instance.

The plaintiff is the owner of Gangseo-si Lane 951m2.

The Defendants are the owners of each building located on the ground of the instant land, and Defendant B owns 36.96 square meters of cement cement and pent roof housing, Defendant C owns the wooden mentor and mentor, Defendant C, 30.71 square meters of a multi-story housing, and Defendant D, 3, of a wooden string, string, and 29.52 square meters of a multi-story housing on the instant land.

B. The portion of each building owned by the Defendants and the amount equivalent to the rent corresponding to the pertinent period of possession are as listed in the following table:

According to the portion of the land owned by the owner (attached Form No. 1), the portion of the land owned by Defendant B, “Ma,” and the portion of the land owned by Defendant B, “ 162 square meters” on January 1, 2003: - October 8, 2012 = 21,941,174 won = (21,583,900 won) on a yearly basis after October 9, 2012 = 2,583,900 square meters, and KRW 163 square meters on February 16, 2011; - on October 8, 2012, the owner of the land (attached Form No. 4,040,773 won) is obligated to return the said portion of land owned by the Defendants to the Plaintiff on a yearly basis, and after October 9, 2012, the portion of the land owned by Defendant C, with no special circumstance, = 205 square meters on the land owned by the Defendants.

2. Determination of the Defendants’ assertion 1 as to the Defendants’ assertion : (a) the Plaintiff used the instant land to the Defendants without compensation until F and E’s survival, an extension, among the co-defendants of the first instance trial; and (b) not, domestic affairs

However, as long as the Defendants paid the Plaintiff the rent, the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants was concluded, the Defendants are therefore.