logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.04 2015고단3902
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant D shall be punished by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Defendant

D. The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, Defendant B, and Defendant C are the ship of Chinese nationality.

1. Defendant A received passbooks and cash cards to be used for the so-called Bosing from H, which is a base for telecommunications-based financial fraud organizations in China, through a door-to-door engineer, and received orders from the victims of Bosing fraud to withdraw and transfer money deposited from Bosing fraud using them, and accepted such orders. A.

Around 13:00 on June 11, 2015, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, in collusion with telecommunications-based financial fraud assistance officers, including the above H, received 1 copy of one bank passbook (L) and one bank card (M) in the name of K, the means of access to the electronic financial transaction, and received 5 copies of passbook and eight cash cards from June 10 to November 11, 2015, for the purpose of using it for the singinginginginging fraud, from the J located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, as described in the attached list of crimes.

B. Fraud 1) On June 10, 2015, the Defendant conspired with H and other telecommunications-based financial fraud investigation staff, and made a false statement that “the employee in charge of telecommunications-based financial fraud was called “O substitute for the plenary session branch of the plenary session” by phoneing the victim’s cell phone, and “the employee in charge of telecommunications-based financial fraud is able to borrow low interest rates from Hyundai Capital if part of the existing loan is repaid. If money is remitted, it would be possible to repay the existing loan instead of the existing loan and to loan at low interest.” The Defendant received KRW 2 million from the victim’s foreign exchange bank account from the victim, and then the Defendant withdrawn KRW 2 million from the said P bank account on the same day on the same day. Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with H and other telecommunications-based financial fraud investigation staff, and received KRW 2 million from the victim by deceiving the victim N, thereby withdrawing KRW 2 million from the victim, including H.

arrow