logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.10.10 2019나51706
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim extended in the trial is dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of not less than 72m2 and not less than 27m2 of H road (the Plaintiff’s land is referred to as “Plaintiff’s land” from the following day, and the name of not less than 3m2 is omitted. The Defendant is the owner of not less than 727m2 (the land that was combined and divided in C and I forests) adjacent to the said land. The Defendant is the owner of not less than 727m2 (the land was changed from the next 1904m2 before J.).

B. In order to connect K, L and M with N and N roads near the land owned by the original Defendant, it was necessary to construct a road exceeding 4 meters wide in part of the instant land in order to construct a new building on the Plaintiff’s land.

Accordingly, on January 26, 2016, the Plaintiff, via E, received the following written consent from the Defendant for land use (the “written consent for land use of this case” from the following date of the evidence A-4-4. The Defendant asserted that the said document was forged, but no evidence exists to acknowledge it).

In relation to an application for a building permit and an application for a permit for development activities under the Bag-gun of Incheon Metropolitan City with a total area of 1,902 square meters of 1,902 square meters prior to the land category J, Jin-gun, Jin-gun, Jin-gun, Jin-gun, and I, I consent to use the same site as above.

In addition, I agree to designate and publicly announce the road as a road under the Building Act under the provisions of Article 35 (Designation, Abolition or Alteration of Road) of the Building Act, and agree to the above-mentioned road as a sewage pipe and to the use of others.

C. On April 2016, the Plaintiff submitted relevant documents, including the written consent to land use, to the Vindication-gun Office, a competent police officer, to construct a detached house on the Plaintiff’s land, and continued construction.

E delegated the authority from the Plaintiff to take charge of the Plaintiff’s affairs concerning the land development work.

The Plaintiff had E build a road by packing concrete packaging on the instant land.

E shall be the plaintiff around January 2017.

arrow