1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 3,875,813 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from November 26, 2015 to May 4, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant operates a real estate brokerage office under the trade name called D real estate in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and the plaintiff is an employee of the above real estate brokerage office.

B. On May 11, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant, around 23:28, has a dispute over the fee for the real estate intermediary on the front road located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan.

The Defendant inflicted injury on the Plaintiff, i.e., the Plaintiff’s face, body boom, etc., which requires approximately seven weeks of treatment on the part of the Plaintiff, by going beyond the Plaintiff’s body tightly and booming the body boom. The Plaintiff also sustained injury on the part of the Defendant’s face, such as a booming boom and the booming body booming boom, etc., and the Plaintiff also sustained injury on the part of the Defendant’s face by drinking the Plaintiff’s face. In addition, the Defendant sustained injury, such as a booming 4 weeks of treatment by drinking it.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant injuries” suffered by the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

The Plaintiff, due to the instant injury, hospitalized in the hospital from May 12, 2015 to May 15, 2015, was charged with the principal charges of KRW 855,440,00 for medical expenses after the surgery on the left-hand refluoral refluoral and non-fluoral surgery. The Plaintiff recovered KRW 1,466,030 from the National Health Insurance Corporation as unjust enrichment and paid it.

The Defendant also borne KRW 158,140 as medical expenses for the instant injury.

Busan District Court issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 to the Plaintiff as Busan District Court Decision 2015 High Court Decision 2015 High Court Decision 17797 on October 29, 2015, and a fine of KRW 4 million to the Defendant. On this issue, the Defendant filed a formal trial and finally sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million to a fine.

(In Busan District Court Decision 2015Da4198, Busan District Court Decision 2016No203, Supreme Court Decision 2016Do967 Decided April 1, 2012). / [Grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. It shall be rejected that the arguments of the judgment party are not separately explained.

As above, recognition of liability.