1. The part of the conjunctive claim in the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff (appointed)'s primary claim.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the father and the selected D’s husband, and the Defendant is the police officer belonging to the Dong-gu Police Station.

B. On July 13, 2012, E appeared as a witness and testified in the case of Gwangju District Court 201Na17805, which filed a lawsuit against F for damages by the Plaintiff and Appointed C, Selected D (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”)

C. On June 1, 2013, the Plaintiffs asserted that 11 items of testimony, among testimony, present at the date of pleading in the instant case, are false, and they filed a complaint with E as perjury with the office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the Dong office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of

On July 18, 2013, the prosecutor G was directed to transfer the above accusation case to the macro-police station by August 18, 2013, and the Defendant was distributed the investigation of the above accusation case on July 22, 2013.

The main process of the investigation of the instant case by the Defendant is as follows.

On July 18, 2013, the lower court determined as follows: (a) on September 3, 2013, 2013, the first interrogation of the Plaintiff on July 22, 2013 (Preparation of the first interrogation protocol) as to E on September 12, 2013 (Preparation of the first interrogation protocol); (b) the first investigation direction as to September 23, 2013 (H; E; and (c) the Nonindicted Investigation Order as to September 3, 2013 (Preparation of the first interrogation protocol as to the Defendant on September 12, 2013; (d) the Nonindicted Investigation Order as to September 23, 2013 (Preparation of the said protocol as to telephone conversations as to October 1, 2013 (Preparation of the Second Investigation Record as to October 5, 2013); and (e) the Nonindicted Investigation Order as to the Nonindicted Investigation Order as to Defendant 1’s 31, 2013.

E. As above, the Defendant investigated the instant accusation case and on October 29, 2013.