1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff et al. filed a lawsuit seeking an increase in business loss compensation amount pursuant to a housing redevelopment project association against “D District Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association” (Seoul Administrative Court 2009Guhap19809) and was sentenced to partial winning of the judgment on November 18, 2010. Although the Plaintiff appealed against this, the judgment of the first instance on February 9, 2012 became final and conclusive.

B. On April 12, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against E on suspicion, such as fabrication of a private document, stating that “E, a certified public appraiser affiliated with an appraisal corporation that received a court’s entrustment of appraisal, entered the details of the reply regarding the request for supplementation of the results of appraisal in a false manner, and forged it.” Defendant C, a police official working at the Seoul Seocho Police Station at the time, investigated the instant complaint case.

On June 11, 2012, the above case was forwarded to the prosecutor's office on the charge of non-prosecution (suspected). On June 13, 2012, the prosecutor decided not to prosecute due to the lack of evidence.

C. In addition, on May 22, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a complaint under the suspicion of fraud stating that the Plaintiff would make two penalties for the head of the association of the D Area Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association would be more compensated for KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,

On June 20, 2012, the above case was forwarded to the prosecution by a prosecutor who was not prosecuted (suspected) and the prosecutor decided not to prosecute.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's entries in Gap's Evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 16, 17, 21, 27, Eul's Evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Defendant C and B, a police official of the gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion, operate documents or ex officio in the course of handling each of the above complaints.