The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the Defendant’s wrong judgment, selling the instant vehicle to another person, and selling the Defendant’s criminal records beyond the suspended sentence, etc. However, the instant case constitutes a case where the Defendant is severely punished by the Road Traffic Act by running a drunk driving, even if the Defendant was punished twice or more due to drunk driving, and the lower court sentenced the statutory imprisonment. The Defendant also under the suspended sentence due to drunk driving, and the Defendant conducted the instant drunk driving while driving the instant case. The Defendant also under the suspended sentence due to the instant drunk driving, resulting in a traffic accident that conflicts between buses, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, health, character and behavior, home environment, drinking habits, drinking alcohol concentration, and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s imprisonment (eight months) is appropriate and too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to do so. It is so decided as per Disposition.