beta
Text
As to the crimes of Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 in the judgment of the defendant, two years of imprisonment and fines of 14,00,000, and the crimes of No. 2 in the judgment of the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months with prison labor for the purpose of fraud, etc. with the Gwangju District Court, and on November 13, 2010, the said judgment became final and conclusive.
"2013 Gohap278"
1. On September 15, 2013, the Defendant knew that the victim E (hereinafter “D”) who works together with a female entertainment loan at an entertainment drinking tavern located in Asan-si, Asan-si (hereinafter “D”) received monthly salary, and told the victim to take a water surface petition, which he/she took, after eating the victim’s usual ties, and using the cres of the victim’s cash and spawds, stiffing, etc. using the cres.
At around 07:00 on the same day, the Defendant explained to the effect that, while waiting for the victim in the room of the victim located in Asan City F, the victim was “Iskly listen to the body,” the victim was “Iskly skly,” “Iskly,” “Iskly,” “Isky,” “Isky,” “Isky,” “Isky,” “Isky,” “Isky,” “Iskly,” “Iskly,” “Iskly,” “Iskly,” “Iskly,” and “Iskly, Isnskly,” but the Defendant refused to drink the drug, thereby soliciting the victim to drink and drink the drug by leaving the water, and making the said drug known to the victim of the drug.
After making it impossible for the Defendant to resist the victim as above, the Defendant took care of the victim’s cash amounting to KRW 500,000,000 in the market value of KRW 500,000,000,000,000 in the market value of KRW 700,000,000,000 in the market value. The Defendant took care of the victim’s 1,000,000,000,000 in the market value of KRW 30,000 in the market value.
"2014 Highly 80"
2. On July 7, 2008, the Defendant: (a) at an entertainment establishment with no knowledge of the trade name in the upper Dong-dong, Jeon Jong-si on July 7, 2008, the Defendant was approaching the victim G who was aware of while working as an employee, who belongs to “81 year-H”; and (b) accessed him as a doping.